Skip to main content

Pricing: Discounting v. Unbundling

With times being so tough, most companies feel that the only way to attract new customers is to lower their pricing. While doing so in some cases will generate a short burst of activity and increased revenues, as a standard, long term course of action, it is not a wise thing to do .

The first reason why it is not a good idea to lower your prices is that your associated costs have not been lowered, and in order to make the same amount of profit, you have to sell a higher percentage of product just to stay even. A case in point, if you lower your prices by 20%, you need to increase your sales volume by 25%. If you reduce your prices by 30%, then you need a correspondent increase in sales VOLUME of 42%; a 40% discount needs a 67% increase in sales. I think you see where this is going. Unless there is a huge amount of elasticity in your pricing (where volume increases appreciably more with a price reduction), that without corresponding lowering of your costs, a reduction in price is at best a stop gap measure and at worst can lead to your eventual demise.

There are also some secondary problems that arise when you just arbitrary lower prices without taking something away in the sale. While market conditions might warrant some course of drastic action, an arbitrary price reduction can accidentally convey two things to your present and future customers. The first is an ongoing expectation that you will always lower your prices when things are tough. This essentially conditions your customers to "wait it out" until you decide to lower prices. The second is an impression that you have been lying to them all along if all of a sudden you can lower you price without giving up anything in exchange. This second situation is disastrous to the long term health of your company.

So what are you to do to increase sales AND profits? If you have to lower your prices, there are some strategies you can use to add more customers, reduce your costs, stay above the fray, and in the process keep from loosing the farm.

First and foremost, you need to look at how much PROFIT you make pre product and which products produce the most profits, not necessarily the most revenues. If you can make $10 selling a $20 item, or $20 selling a $100 item, sell the hell out of the $20 item. Plus the margin on the $20 item is 50% (versus 20%), and it will be a hell of a lot easier to sell five $20 items, than one $100 item (usually). Next, look at your portfolio of products and get rid (i.e. stop selling) those products that do NOT generate significant PROFITS. That is right! You may have to shelve high volume revenue products that are NOT producing profits. THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT CONCEPT I CAN CONVEY TO YOU, and it will be a hard pill to swallow in some case, but in the long run the you will see the benefits of actually having MORE money and will have to exert LESS effort in obtaining it by following this strategy.

OK, say all your products make about the same profits, and they are all priced comparably, what then? The next strategy is called unbundling. Say you have a product you sell for $100, and it has 3 or 4 components to it. Well, you can now remove sell each component separately for say $40 (versus $25 in a bundle), OK, say you cannot physically separate the product what then? Well you can ask the customer to give up (or pay extra for) the warranty, or customer service, or something if you are going to sell it for anything close to $25. This does two things: First is to increase your profits (or reduce your costs) and secondly instill some value for the “freebies” you used to give away while giving your customers the power to choose what “features” they want to pay (or save on) for.

A good example unbundling comes from Proctor & Gamble's attempt to sell shampoo into India. Initially, P&G wanted to sell a 12 oz container of its shampoo into the Indian market (similar to how they sell in Europe and the USA. There initial foray was disastrous for two reasons. First, this container cost the equivalent of a day's salary and secondly since Indians do not wash their hair as often as in the West, the quantity was equivalent to a year's worth of shampoo. P&G was able to penetrate this market (and still holds an 80% market share) when repacked their product for a single use size (about 20 rupees or 40 cents). This move was actually MORE profitable for P&G than selling in volume and allowed them to services a market that was previously untapped.

Too often I just see people leave money on the table when price negotiations begin and end. With these strategies and focusing on your profits (instead of just revenues), you will be in a better position to weather this economic storm of uncertainty.


Popular posts from this blog

The Moldy Middle

While taking statistics during my quest to get an MBA and while earning my engineering degree, the professors always emphasized the importance of finding the statistical mean of any population by using the Central Mean Theorem (a.k.a the highest point of the Bell Curve).
As an engineer, this was essential in order to maximize throughput, minimize cost and waste, and ultimately make a better, faster, cheaper widget. A funny thing happened on the way to the dark side of marketing. I discovered that the only thing in the middle of the road was quite literally dead road kill.
I do not know if you remember stores like Bradlees, Ames and Service Merchandise (just to name a few), but they all folded because the environment changed and they were caught trying to service the mythological “average customer.”
Part of that change came when Wal-Mart began its juggernaut with the discount department store. Wal-Mart did two things right: 1) Focused on “mobile” consumers, and 2) Focused on offering g…

Lupercalia and St. Valentine's Day

OK, I just could not resist this: Romance, sex, orgies, wolves, and martyrdom all under one legend. Oh my, what a day we have!!! We might celebrate romance and sweethearts on this day, but boy, the Romans really knew how to party. While history is fun, it is also interesting to know how some things never change (like falling in love and celebrating it!). Happy St. Valentine’s and Lupercalia. May you celebrate it at your heart’s content with someone who has stolen or whom you have given your heart away!  Lupercalia is uniquely Roman. It harkens back to the days when Rome was nothing more than a few shepherds living on a hill known as Palantine and was surrounded by wilderness teeming with wolves. The name comes from lupus, or the latin form of wolf, that celebrates the founding of Rome by Romulus and Remus (as they were suckled by a she-wolf). 
Another thought is that Lupercus, protector of flocks against wolves, is a likely candidate for the name. In any case, there is no question abou…

The Saleman's Litmus Test

If your goal is to become a great company or even improve your existing one, every employee in you company should be able to “sell” the product or service that you are merchandising. Since that is usually not the case, you are forced to hire sales people to help implement the objectives laid out by upper management.

A national study indicated that less than 3% of the population has an inherent penchant for sales, and as much as 50% of all salespeople really do not know how to sell. During my 20 odd years in sales, I have hired, worked with, and observed great sales people (yes, both men and women). Being the observant type and believing in best practices, I have complied a listing of questions you should ask any salesperson before you hire them, and should use this Litmus Test to review of your existing sales force to determine whether to keep them or cut them loose.  I hope you find it useful.

Psyching Out the Test: People always try to answer questions the way they think you want th…